Monday, 5 March 2012

Banksy on 'permission-based creative commons advertising'

OK, I can see the irony here (as Banksy's work is often placed in an environment where you have no choice but to see it but maybe you can use it and amend it) however this statement, purported to be by Banksy resonates with me.

It's like another take on Seth Godin's permission marketing and it goes like this:

Banksy on advertising

"People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are ‘The Advertisers’ and they are laughing at you. 

You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity.

F**k that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head.

You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs”


Once you become aware of the messages from brands hitting you as you drive or walk through a town the 'noise' becomes really distracting.

You can choose to fast-forward past TV adverts, or tune to another channel as with Radio yet how do you tune out of hoardings, bus-sides, posters etc? You can't and there are laws preventing us from copying, deleting or changing  images we simply cannot avoid; even if we find them distasteful, demeaning or insulting (even even to our intelligence!).



Full disclosure: Maybe Banky's not the only slightly hypocritical one here. I work in marketing and have previously been responsible for wrapping buildings in advertising.
Maybe there are too many rules in the world already, or maybe there is a discussion to be had about ambient advertising that plays on insecurities, or that sees itself as untouchable, fits into a 2012 world.

Opted-in, personal, relevant, optional advertising that adds value to the individual has to be the end game as companies shout louder and louder for a reducing amount of attention.




Friday, 2 March 2012

Summit of Customer Engagement 2012

The Summit of Customer Engagement (a Customer Reference Forum event) held in San Mateo CA finished yesterday and, with some help from some jet lag I've been thinking about what went on over the last three days.


Networking and knowledge share
I started to write these as different categories then realised that for customer reference pros they are the same thing. Interesting.

Get any two customer reference pros together, even from competing organisations and you are sure to have a remarkably open conversation about shared issues AND successes. Why is this? I know for a fact that this open exchange of ideas does not happen in other areas of marketing and I truly hope our discipline stays this way.

Perhaps we sometimes feel as the hidden heroes of marketing; strange when you think about it as for many companies their marketing strategies are now based on third-party endorsement, plus we get to actually work as a key part of the deal-closing team.

Ho hum. Back to the event. Sure, some of the sessions were good however I took some time to watch the interaction in between sessions, at lunch and in the evenings and from a career progression and best-practice efficiency perspective the event was very good. Lots of business card swapping and no doubt LinkedIn inviting going on.

A forum for future attendee interaction that includes the vendors would make sense.

What was new?
Not that much this year (a teeny bit groundhog day-esque) and often it was in non-scripted throwaway comments that get you to think,  such as

"
It's still location location location but the location is in your customer's pocket, on their smartphone"
or
"I used to work in procurement and whenever I spoke to a reference I always asked, 'so, what are you getting in return for doing this' "
 
Some of the content was great, some less so, some was a slightly awkward fit and some (apparently) pure sales pitch.

What I DID enjoy very much was the opportunity to co-present a two-hour workshop with Caroline Thomas, the British contingent was there in greater numbers than normal, I got to spend time with some clients and friends and that our US team and business is really starting to take shape and I could see it in action.

For next year I think that the workshops should be trimmed to 75 minutes and mixed up with the normal sessions, also that we get the chance to present on bigger topics such as globalisation and the future roadmap for the profession.

I'll follow up with some takeaways at some point once it's all sunk in however  all in all it was a great event and you can bet I'm going to be there in 2013.