Friday, 3 May 2013
Wednesday, 17 April 2013
On top of this, a multitude of comms channels require constant feeding. The myriad of ways customers wish to consume content means an almost insatiable need for new channel/device-optimised formats. All with flat budgets too, so it does not take Einstein to calculate that:
Faced with this new reality here are five obvious actions to take:
1) Increase funding (demonstrate the need and programme value – not always easy)
2) Become more efficient (and consider outsourcing)
3) Stop doing some things, or don’t beat yourself up about not being able to do everything
4) Most CRPs spend >60% of their effort supporting sales, can you bill for bid support?
5) Automate where possible
As with any complex topic there is not one single answer, it’s probably a combination of the above and some great ideas I've not thought of!
HERE'S THE THING
I believe that some degree of marketing automation is no longer optional for any global tech organisation. Inevitably this must impact CRPs.
Done well, marketing automation takes boring, repetitive or difficult data-manipulation tasks and makes them simple. Tied to business intelligence (BI), marketing automation should deliver financial/time savings, better targeting and means of measurement.
But, before we get a little carried away, just because you can automate a task does this mean that you should automate it? Should you have value and volume approaches that sit side by side?
A CUSTOMER IS NOT A TIN OF BEANS
I recently sat through a presentation from a global tech reference manager. She proudly proclaimed she had automated all touch points with her customers and was no longer required to speak to them. Her automated system sends emails to try to persuade her customers to be references and the system will continue to do so monthly, in perpetuity until they say yes. Note, there is no opt-out option.
Automation at work. I’m sure it’s saving her money (and certainly the inconvenience of picking up the phone); she no doubt has the metrics.
How did we get to the point that the ability to build a relationship directly or indirectly with not merely a customer, but a reference customer is abad thing? Something so inconsequential we’d rather palm it off to a machine.
Don’t get me wrong, there are some great reference programmes out there where automation is used very well for pre-approved content (Cisco’s Kinetic system, for example). For some lower-level volume reference recruitment survey-based processes bring perfectly acceptable results.
But can we really treat potential reference customer activities like tins of baked beans; logged in an online system and called off for delivery at will?
I’m not so sure this is a sustainable long-term strategy.
WHERE DOES ALL THIS LEAVE CUSTOMER REFERENCE PROFESSIONALS?
I believe this all makes customer reference pros more relevant, important and busier than ever because:
References are trust and goodwill made tangible but they are only as good as your customer's opinion of your organisation at thatexact moment in time. The customer controls reference use and there needs to be a living-breathing feedback loop within your CRP.
To create a marketing output that actually means something and makes a difference there is a growing need for the services of CRP professionals. These activities will support:
- The day to day box shifting needs of the sales force and local P&Ls
- The aspirational marketing strategies of corporate and brand
- The social, mobile, multi-screen consumption of marketing information by our customers
They are key to delivering parallel yet integrated volume and value programmes that meet the need of increased demand and also support sustainable reference customer relationships.
Posted by Robin Hamilton at 17.4.13
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
To develop the profession, educate, provide accreditation and recognition and leave a lasting legacy for future generations. Read on, or download this manifesto here
The customer reference community is at a tipping point.
Actually it’s at two tipping points.
The first one is small by comparison, relating to how broadband and mobile speeds and devices will change the deliverables we create in line with how much of the world now consumes content: immediate, mobile, sound bite, relevant, personal and narrow-band.
The second is much larger; in fact it’s so big and obvious it’s easy to miss, and yet hard to know how to deal with it.
This is the tipping point of the community itself; Customer Reference Programmes leaping from a mere marketing discipline into a recognised profession.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines a profession as “a paid occupation, especially one that involves prolonged training and a formal qualification” and in its definition of a professional the dictionary uses the words “competent, skilful, or assured”
There is now such a wealth of experience, expertise, tried and trusted processes, techniques and forms plus a critical mass of practitioners AND an interest in the value of the work we do that it’s time to put a stake in the ground before evolving further.
What do we need to do?
· Seize this moment
· Formalise the profession
· Leave a legacy
What will it look like?
Hard to say as it is a group decision but it will initially include a fiercely independent web space with all the basic tools a reference pro needs, best-practices etc plus a forum that is moderated and rewards good citizens. Details of training and accreditation will be there (foundation, practitioner, advanced etc), as will details of events and other resources. It will be free to all, maybe subtle sponsorship allowed. Roles will probably be for limited terms, by election. Democratic and open.
Why do we need to take action?
On the face of it we don’t. Customer Reference professionals are some of the most collaborative and open marketing professionals there are.
While we don’t NEED to do this I believe we are obligated to act. Take any professional organisation and you can trace it back to a set of individuals that recognised their skill for what it was, and thought bigger.
Even if one ignores legacy, education and the greater good there are still reasons to do this:
Although there are many LinkedIn, Facebook and face2face groups already in existence almost none of them are not aligned in a larger or smaller way to a specific vendor, geography, or industry.
We speak about the freedom of Social Media yet this freedom is being abused. We have a situation where competitors’ tweets are not forwarded no matter how good they are, what are billed as ‘discussions’ are often promotions and those with the biggest mouth (or time to type, or axe to grind) are completely un-moderated.
True communities set values and work for the greater good, which is why the professional body we will establish MUST have ways to amplify great content and genuinely helpful contributors and also ways to try to modify self-interest, with the ultimate sanction of removal from the professional community if needed.
What do you need to do?
Nothing, however IF you share these beliefs, have expertise and experience to share and want to be part of the team that will attempt to create a lasting structure for customer reference professionals, and their profession then please email your interest (or encouragement, or reasons why this is a spectacularly bad idea) to:
Personally I can think of 30 or so thought leaders in this space that would make an excellent team. Your list might be very different from mine so even if you don’t have sufficient experience yet, why not nominate someone you think is a ‘must’ to be part of this movement at:
*’customer reference’ and ‘customer advocacy’ can be used interchangeably in this manifesto.
This manifesto was originally outlined in Boston at the ICRPC on May 15th 2012.
Feel free to share and use in any way you wish.
Posted by Robin Hamilton at 6.6.12
Monday, 5 March 2012
OK, I can see the irony here (as Banksy's work is often placed in an environment where you have no choice but to see it but maybe you can use it and amend it) however this statement, purported to be by Banksy resonates with me.
It's like another take on Seth Godin's permission marketing and it goes like this:
Banksy on advertising
"People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are ‘The Advertisers’ and they are laughing at you.
You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity.
F**k that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head.
You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs”
Once you become aware of the messages from brands hitting you as you drive or walk through a town the 'noise' becomes really distracting.
You can choose to fast-forward past TV adverts, or tune to another channel as with Radio yet how do you tune out of hoardings, bus-sides, posters etc? You can't and there are laws preventing us from copying, deleting or changing images we simply cannot avoid; even if we find them distasteful, demeaning or insulting (even even to our intelligence!).
Full disclosure: Maybe Banky's not the only slightly hypocritical one here. I work in marketing and have previously been responsible for wrapping buildings in advertising.
Maybe there are too many rules in the world already, or maybe there is a discussion to be had about ambient advertising that plays on insecurities, or that sees itself as untouchable, fits into a 2012 world.
Opted-in, personal, relevant, optional advertising that adds value to the individual has to be the end game as companies shout louder and louder for a reducing amount of attention.
Posted by Robin Hamilton at 5.3.12
Friday, 2 March 2012
The Summit of Customer Engagement (a Customer Reference Forum event) held in San Mateo CA finished yesterday and, with some help from some jet lag I've been thinking about what went on over the last three days.
"It's still location location location but the location is in your customer's pocket, on their smartphone"
Posted by Robin Hamilton at 2.3.12
Thursday, 17 November 2011
Mixing metaphors, my view is that having REAL metrics on reference material usage, influence and therefore ROI is pretty much a holy grail but also an area in which there are some folks selling snake oil :o).
Yes we can look at web-stats, make folks register to view assets (poor practice) or view asset usage statistics linked to associated deals via reference fulfilment processes or systems and this does give us numbers but it tells us nothing really about the business impact of case studies.
We operate global reference helpdesk for a few organisations, managing thousands of request per year and yes we can say how often specific case studies were supplied and (in some circumstances) even if they were used and can correlate these against specific deal values. It’s way better than nothing but does not measure ROI.
Here’s the thing:
Imagine you are trying to close a ten-year, billion dollar outsourcing deal and you are part of the pursuit/bid team. You might invest half a million dollars in the bid itself and one of the items you will use at some point will be a written or video case study, assets that might exist anyway that cost $2,000 to $20,000.
Even if the case study was used right at the beginning of the process in order for you to get through to the last round of the pitch, and it gets used just once no-one is going to say that it was not worth creating a $2,000 case study for just one $1b use. Nor can anyone say that the case study had an ROI of 5,000,000%.
It’s the same in the volume space. I’ve seen all sorts of claims about video, and white papers etc. yet we all know that direct sales teams sell most of their stuff using PowerPoint slides, most of which would be unrecognisable to the teams that lovingly created them and also many of which will be for customers that are not approved references!
A correlation between two sets of numbers (we changed this, the numbers did that) is not the same as cause and effect and I’m not always sure the due diligence has been done to independently verify results.
What we DO know is that every piece of research out there and also research we have done for clients shows pretty much the same thing; irrespective of format, customer-approved content in the form of a case study is the most-requested deliverable, used right throughout the purchase cycle (with an emphasis on the early stages) and that measured use is only a small indication of real use because folks keep their reference libraries on their laptops and like to share.
Short of interviewing the entire customer team that was involved with the purchase, the influencers, the decision makers as well as the sales team themselves and asking them which materials were effective and by what percent (and even then you will get subjective answers), measuring usage via request tracking and downloads is pretty much it.
My advice to anyone in this space? CRPs have much better measurement than other influencer marketing activities and we can measure much more interesting and business-impacting stuff with ROI numbers attached than the number of times case studies are used
Posted by Robin Hamilton at 17.11.11
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
Recently I've seen a couple of organisations embracing the measurement of customer/client satisfaction.
This is good, and there's even been 'Net Promoter-esque' measurement methodologies employed based on The Ultimate Question.
Now they have their numbers both these organisations have 'wimped-out' when it comes to the important bit - taking action.
Receiving of the feedback is just the beginning of the real interaction. Sure, you have your number but where's the value for your customers/clients?
Don't ask if you don't intend to act. When you ask for feedback there is an unwritten deal made; that you will act on it, or say why it does not make sense for you to do so.
Surely asking for feedback then ignoring the opportunity for two-way dialogue is worse than not asking at all.
Posted by Robin Hamilton at 8.11.11